The installation of a community battery in Nundah has been blocked, citing concerns about the loss of green space. The decision, part of a broader dispute over renewable energy infrastructure, has sparked a mixed response from local residents and environmental advocates.
Background and Context
BCC recently rejected a proposal to install a community battery at the site of the old Scouts Hall in Nundah. The decision is part of a broader pushback against the State’s renewable energy initiative aimed at promoting local solar energy storage.
The battery, known as the PowerShaper XL, is approximately the size of a household fridge and is intended to store solar energy for later use. It was one of three proposed installations in Brisbane, along with sites in Newmarket and The Gap. The installations were to be funded through the State’s $200 million community batteries for household solar program, which aims to support sustainable energy use across the country.
Photo Credit: Pixii
Community and Environmental Impact
Many residents and environmental groups disagreed with BCC’s decision. Some community members, particularly those in Nundah, feel that the loss of a small area of green space is a reasonable trade-off for improved energy storage and sustainability.
Residents like those living near Boyd Park in Nundah argue that the site, previously occupied by the Scouts Hall, has not been significantly transformed into a community space since the building’s removal. While some greenery has been established, they believe the area lacks active use and could accommodate the battery without significant disruption.
Others, however, have supported the BCC’s stance, valuing green space preservation over infrastructure changes. This sentiment reflects a broader debate within the community about balancing urban development with environmental conservation.
Challenges and Alternatives
One of the primary challenges identified by the local officials is the location of the batteries within green spaces. The BCC’s environment chair, Tracy Davis, stated that large infrastructure like community batteries should not be “plonked” into public parks.
However, critics argue that similar infrastructure, such as NBN or traffic signal boxes, already exists in urban environments without causing significant disruption. Community members have also suggested exploring alternative sites, including underutilised or abandoned substation areas, which could serve the same purpose without impacting green spaces.
The State has urged the BCC to reconsider its stance or propose alternative sites in the same suburbs. Other Queensland councils have found compromise solutions, offering different locations when rejecting initial proposals.
Photo Credit: Pixii Energy Storage/Facebook
Public Reactions and Community Debate
Online discussions have revealed a mix of frustration and support. Some residents question why the BCC prioritises green space in this instance while backing other large projects, such as developing parts of Victoria Park into an Olympic stadium.
Others feel that the decision reflects inconsistency, pointing out the long-term benefits of community batteries in reducing household energy costs and reliance on non-renewable sources.
Others argued that energy companies should utilise existing infrastructure rather than occupy public spaces. Some comments expressed scepticism about whether the authorities genuinely prioritise environmental concerns or if other motives are at play.
Next Steps
The BCC’s decision to block the community battery in Nundah remains contentious, with both environmental advocates and residents calling for a reassessment. The State continues to push for alternative solutions, stressing the importance of renewable energy infrastructure in urban areas.
Community members are now waiting to see whether the authorities will offer alternative sites or maintain its position, as debate continues over balancing green space preservation with the need for sustainable energy solutions.
Published 1-Apr-2025
